AFC Cable Systems Inc. v. Clisham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s non-compete agreement was void because employee’s title and pay structure changed and employer made repeated efforts to have employee sign a new non-compete agreement
• finding that the focus under F.A. Bartlett is the change in employment relationship, not how much time went by between the signing of the restrictive covenant and the attempt to enforce it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).