Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs’ claim for disgorgement should be aggregated because the claim was made “without reference to any actual damages sustained by any individual plaintiff’
• holding that a claim for disgorgement falls within the common and undivided interest exception
• holding that a disgorgement claim could be aggregated to satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement in a case brought under the D.C. Restraint of Trade Act, D.C. CODE § 28-4501 et seq.
• deciding whether removal was proper before deciding whether to stay pending ruling by Judicial Panel on Multidislrict Litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).