Skip to main content
· 5/31/1985

Aetna-Standard Engineering Co. v. Rowland

Citations

  • 493 A.2d 1375
  • 343 Pa. Super. 64
  • 228 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 292
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that while employer has no right to employee’s patent interest, under shop right employer was entitled to the royalty-free, non-exclusive use of the invention
  • “[S]tate court has jurisdiction to consider the issue of patent validity as a defense to the action [to recover patent royalties].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Tamilia, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.