Aetna Life and Casualty Company v. Carolyn Barthelemy Peter M. Barthelemy Michael Barthelemy Vicki McSparran Vicki McSparran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The more likely harm is to result from certain intentional conduct, the more likely intent to harm may be inferred as a matter of law.”
• “The reason for the [inferred-intent] rule is inexorably intertwined with the tender age of the child.”
• “Where stops the reason, there stops the rule.” (quoting Karl N. Llewellyn, Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice 217 (1962))
• “Elitzky mandates a ‘subjective intent’ analysis for determining coverage under an exclusionary clause in most Pennsylvania insurance cases . . . .” (citing Wiley, 995 F.2d at 460
• “Where stops the reason, there stops the rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).