Aetna Insurance v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Arkansas statute did not prohibit insurance company from excluding coverage where insured’s injuries were fully covered by workmen’s compensation
• holding that an insurer may contract with its insured on whatever terms the parties may agree that are not contrary to statute or public policy
• construing Ark. Stat. Ann. § 66-4017, the antecedent to Ark. Code Ann. § 23-89-205
• policy terms may not be contrary to public policy
• policy terms may not be contrary to public policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).