Skip to main content
· 10/9/1975

Aetna Insurance v. Kent

Citations

  • 540 P.2d 1383
  • 85 Wash. 2d 942
  • 1975 Wash. LEXIS 947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • gross disparity of approximately 30 to 1 premium ratio between types of policies indicated it was reasonable to believe both parties intended the policies to provide mutually exclusive coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horowitz, Stafford, Finley, Rosellini, Hunter, Hamilton, Wright, Utter, Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.