Aetna Insurance Company v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the insured had an insurable interest in a grocery store, even though she did not own it, because all the proceeds were used to care for the insured
• insurable interest is not determined by concept of title, but by whether insured has substantial economic interest in the property
• \The public policy of this state renders an insurance policy invalid when the insured has no insurable interest in the property or the risk insured ... .\
• when the insured has no insurable interest in the property or the risk insured, the public policy of Florida renders insurance policy invalid on ground that same constitutes a wagering contract
• “The public policy of this state renders an insurance policy invalid when the insured has no insurable interest in the property or the risk insured on the grounds that same constitutes a wagering contract.”
• “In Florida an ‘insurable interest’ is not determined by the concept of title”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).