Aetna Ins. Co. v. Hyde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between attacks on a rule’s “substantive validity” and its “procedural lineage,” Id. at 195

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jacobs v. Leggett
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1956-11-12· cited 25×
• Pennsylvania Insurance Department v. Philadelphia
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-09-19· cited 21×
• Houghton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Second Circuit· 1934-06-18· cited 9×
• American Ins. Co. v. Lucas
  W.D. Missouri· 1940-08-14· cited 9×
• VIRGINIA STATE AFL-CIO v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1969-04-28· cited 8×
• Flat Wireless, LLC v. FCC
  D.C. Circuit· 2019-12-10· cited 5×
• PA. INSURANCE DEPT. v. Phila.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-09-19· cited 2×
• Cavanaugh v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
  D. Nebraska· 1951-09-18· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission
  Supreme Court· 1923-06-11· cited 575×
• German Alliance Insurance v. Lewis
  Supreme Court· 1914-04-20· cited 400×
• McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.
  Supreme Court· 1926-11-22· cited 216×
• Ohio Oil Co. v. Conway
  Supreme Court· 1929-03-05· cited 181×
• Aetna Insurance v. Hyde
  Supreme Court· 1928-01-03· cited 91×
• Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Aeby
  Supreme Court· 1928-01-03· cited 84×
• SW Tel. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.
  Supreme Court· 1923-05-21· cited 19×
• A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1926-10-25· cited 6×