Aetna Casualty & Surety Co v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that two courts’ agreement that plaintiff was not covered by policy demonstrated that insurance company had reasonable basis for denying claim
• finding that two courts’ agreement that plaintiff was not covered by policy demonstrated that insurance company had reasonable basis for denying claim
• “[T]here are times when the issue of bad faith is not a question appropriate for determination by the jury.”
• “[T]here are times when the issue 10 of bad faith is not a question appropriate for determination by the jury.”
• “An insurance company’s failure to adequately investigate only 5 becomes material when a further investigation would have disclosed relevant facts.”
• ““Whether the insurer ultimately loses its dispute with the insured 24 is not important to the resolution of the bad faith issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).