Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Roe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court's grant of summary judgment where third party claims did not trigger insurer's duty to defend insured
• applying inferred intent doctrine to sexual and physical abuse of children in a day school
• Superior Court reviewed trial court’s resolution of insurer’s action seeking declaration of duty to defend and indemnify
• “An insured intends an injury if he/she desires to cause the consequences of his/her act or if he/she acted knowing - that such consequences were substantially certain to result.”
• “It is the face of the complaint and not the truth of the facts alleged therein which determines whether there is a duty to defend.”
• “The insurer’s obligation to defend is fixed solely by the allegations in the underlying complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).