Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that two excess “other insurance” clauses were mutually repugnant
• “[W]hen other insurance clauses of two policies are of identical effect in that they operate mutually to reduce or eliminate the amount of collectible insurance available, neither provides primary coverage and pro rata distribution is appropriate”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).