Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Holtzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a misapplication of funds offense constituted a CIMT in part because it has “consistently” been interpreted to include as an element “intent to injure or defraud” the victim bank

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).