· 12/28/1976
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Coronet Insurance
Citations
- 358 N.E.2d 914
- 44 Ill. App. 3d 744
- 3 Ill. Dec. 371
- 1976 Ill. App. LEXIS 3566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that where a party cites no authority to support an argument, we may assume no such authority exists
- focusing on policy limits as defined in the automobile liability insurance contract to determine the exposure of the insurer
- “The purpose of a duty to defend an insured is to protect the insured from the expenses of the litigation as well as the liabilities for which he could be held.”
- “The purpose of a duty to defend an insured is to protect the insured from the expenses of the litigation as well as the liabilities for which he could be held.”
- costs and indemnity recoverable under subrogation theory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eberspacher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.