Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Chicago Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s judgment that primary insurer, was not hable for the settlement as its participation was never requested until the settlement had been reached
• “the defendant insurance company must have been liable to the insured in order for the plaintiff insurance company to recover”
• reimbursement ultimately not required for lack of tender to primary carrier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).