Skip to main content
· 3/30/1976

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London

Citations

  • 56 Cal. App. 3d 791
  • 129 Cal. Rptr. 47
  • 1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to find that excess insurer had only optional duty to defend absent \clear and certain statement in their policies\
  • declining to find that excess insurer had only optional duty to defend absent “clear and certain statement in their policies”
  • declining to find that excess insurer had only optional duty to defend absent “clear and certain statement in their policies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.