Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bank is not required to demonstrate conclusively that plaintiff was actually responsible for its troubled condition to be relieved of obligation to pay severance benefits
• concluding that the bank president could not recover severance benefits provided by his employment agreement following his termination since the troubled bank was unable to make the certification required under 12 CFR § 359.4 (a) (4
• concluding that the bank president could not recover severance benefits provided by his employment agreement following his termination since the troubled bank was unable to make the certification required under 12 C.F.R. § 359.4 (a) (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).