Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. O'Rourke Bros., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insurer breached its duty to defend when it filed its declaratory-judgment complaint 11 months after learning of the complaints being filed against its insured
• holding that the insurer breached its duty to defend when it filed its declaratory-judgment complaint 11 months after learning of the complaints being filed against its insured
• single fraudulent sales campaign triggered per occurrence limits regardless of the number of individual claims or injuries
• single fraudulent sales campaign triggered per occurrence limits regardless of the number of individual claims or injuries
• single fraudulent sales campaign triggered per occurrence limits regardless of the number of individual claims or injuries
• rejecting an interpretation that would “deny [the insured] all coverage and make [the] policy coverage illusory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).