Aerotronics, Inc. v. Pneumo Abex Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, while decisions by the Missouri Court of Appeals may be used as an indication of how the Missouri Supreme Court may rule, we are not bound to follow those decisions
• parol evidence, when admissible, is considered to determine what was in the minds of the contractual parties when they entered into the contract
• parol evidence, when admissible, is considered to determine what was in the minds of the contractual parties when they entered into the contract
• \[T]he procuring cause doctrine is limited by the terms of a contract; it cannot be used to supplant or contradict the terms of a contract entered into between parties.\
• \[t]he procuring cause doctrine is limited by the terms of a contract; it cannot be used to supplant or contradict the terms of a contract entered into between parties.\
• “In both Michigan and Ohio, the procuring cause doctrine is limited by the terms of a contract; it cannot be used to supplant or contradict the terms of a contract entered into between parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).