· 6/7/2013
Aeroplate Corp., a California Corporation v. the United States 12-374c and
Citations
- 111 Fed. Cl. 298
- 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 614
- 2013 WL 2452702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the movant’s claim and thus could not grant permissive intervention
- holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the movant’s claim and thus could not grant permissive intervention
- not allowing permissive intervention because of the lack of an independent basis for jurisdiction
- not allowing permissive intervention because of the lack of an independent basis for jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.