Skip to main content
· 6/7/2013

Aeroplate Corp., a California Corporation v. the United States 12-374c and

Citations

  • 111 Fed. Cl. 298
  • 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 614
  • 2013 WL 2452702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the movant’s claim and thus could not grant permissive intervention
  • holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over the movant’s claim and thus could not grant permissive intervention
  • not allowing permissive intervention because of the lack of an independent basis for jurisdiction
  • not allowing permissive intervention because of the lack of an independent basis for jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.