Advo, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the minimal probative value of allegations of defective design, as opposed to evidence showing the particular circumstances of similar accidents
• court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded an expert's opinion that was based on unreliable accident statistics
• preparation of statistical data strictly in anticipation of litigation is a factor to be considered in exelud- ing expert testimony
• “Though the courts have afforded experts a wide latitude in picking and choosing the sources on which to base opinions, Rule 703 nonetheless requires courts to examine the reliability of those sources.”
• “[A]lthough the use of unsupported allegations in prior lawsuits . . . may not have been of the strongest probative value, neither was the lack of support particularly prejudicial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).