Skip to main content
· 5/16/2002

Advisory Opinion to Attorney General

Citations

  • 818 So. 2d 491
  • 2002 WL 992066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure of ballot summary to explain that proposed amendment is self-effectuating did not render the summary misleading and noting that “imperfection is not necessarily fatal given the seventy-five word statutory maximum”
  • voters must acquaint themselves with the details of a proposed amendment together with the pros and cons thereon before they enter the voting booth and if they: do not, it is no function of the ballot to provide that needed education

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.