Advantage Homebuilding, LLC. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing Exclusion j.(6) “was intended to exclude ‘property damage’ that directly or consequentially occurs from the faulty workmanship of the insured and its contractors/subcontractors . . . while the work is ongoing”
• “there was no dispute that the work was in progress when the subcontractor damaged the windows” because the windows were scratched when the subcontractor dropped mortar on them
• there was no duty to indemnify for the losses alleged by plaintiffs because the physical damage had occurred during the course of the work and before it was complete
• “Although the record on appeal does not indicate where the insurance contract at issue was entered into, the parties agree that Kansas law controls (and thus, presumably, the contract was entered into in Kansas).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).