Advanced Concepts Chicago, Inc. v. CDW Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• contract specifically identified plaintiff DBE as subcontractor and also mandated that 40% of work be performed by DBEs - 10 - No. 1-24-1911 generally
• contract requiring a contractor to enter into an agreement with a subcontractor and submit affidavits confirming payments was for the direct benefit of named subcontractor
• even if a third party is not specifically named in contract, “it is sufficient that a class of potential third-party beneficiaries be adequately defined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).