Advanced Card Technologies LLC v. Versatile Card Technology, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• estopping a party from challenging the validity of a patent for “royalty payments that were not made in respect of sales accruing prior to the filing of this action”
• “[I]t is well settled that the invention is not limited to the preferred embodiment if the claim language is broader than that single embodiment.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).