Advanced Bodycare Solutions, LLC v. Thione International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court had USCA11 Case: 25-11605 Document: 22-1 Date Filed: 02/18/2026 Page: 3 of 7 25-11605 Opinion of the Court 3 jurisdiction to review a timely-appealed Rule 50(b) motion even though this Court lacked jurisdiction to review the final judgment
• explaining that an untimely Rule 4(a)(4) motion does not toll the time to appeal
• noting that an untimely post-judg- ment motion does not toll the time to appeal
• “[S]ince Rule 6(b) is a claims-processing rule, . . . in failing to object to the district court's violation of the rule (by extending the time for filing post-trial motions) [the non-filing party] forfeited its objection to the time extension.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).