Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. v. Norris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the presumption of inherent distinctiveness no longer applies following cancellation
• hearsay evidence proffered through witness affidavit insufficient to demonstrate unsolicited media coverage without documentary evidence of such coverage in the record
• “The elements of Defendants’ common law claims for trademark infringement and unfair competition are similar to their federal claims, except that New York unfair competition law also requires a showing of actual confusion and bad faith before monetary relief maybe awarded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).