Skip to main content
· 12/7/1995

Adult Video Association Poe, Inc. And Roe, Inc. v. United States Department of Justice William Barr Patrick Trueman Edward Bryant and Dan L. Newsom

Citations

  • 71 F.3d 563
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34331
  • 1995 WL 725013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing a chilling effect from “the immediate threat of concrete, harmful action”
  • “[T]he ripeness doctrine not only depends on the finding of a case and controversy and hence jurisdiction under Article III, but it also requires that the court exercise its discretion to determine if judicial resolution would be desirable under all of the circumstances.”
  • drawing the same distinction between facial challenges and as-applied challenges
  • “[T]he ripeness doctrine not only depends on the finding of a case and controversy and hence jurisdiction under Article III, but it also requires that the court exercise its discretion to determine if judicial resolution would be desirable under all of the circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Boggs, Hood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.