Adsem v. Roske

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exception requires that the harm alleged must have been \maliciously and specifically directed at the employee\
• conduct of employer was, at most, gross negligence and, therefore, did not rise to the level of intentional conduct contemplated by the exception to the exclusivity rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).