Adriene Sibley v. Seminole Pipeline Company, LLC, Enterprise Products Operating, LLC, First Call Field Service Corp., and TDW Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “de novo review of the evidence may promote efficiency when there is an evidentiary error below because we can review the evidence anew, without considering the inadmissible evidence”
• providing we “give weight to the factual findings of the juvenile court, especially regarding the credibility of witnesses”
• finding juvenile did not commit an assault against victim who followed juvenile to an abandoned house
• noting de novo standard of review “requires this court to review the ‘facts as well as the law [to] determine from the credible evidence [the parties’] rights anew.’” (alterations in original) (citation omitted)
• observing neither statutory nor constitutional provisions guarantee juveniles the right a jury trial
• “We have continued to assert that juvenile proceedings are in equity and subject to de novo review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).