Adrian Vicente Barbosa v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the jury awarded backpay under the Family Medical Leave Act and the district court ordered reinstatement, frontpay, and attorney fees
• commenting that the purpose of our error-preservation rule is to give “opposing counsel notice and an opportunity to be heard on the issue and a chance to take proper corrective measures or pursue alternatives in the event of an adverse ruling.”
• declining to address an issue on appeal “because it was not presented to or ruled upon by the district court”
• noting “[w]e will not exalt form over substance” when considering error preservation
• “We recognize the fundamental doctrine of appellate review that issues must be raised in the district court before we may review them on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).