Skip to main content
· 6/23/1994

Adrian L. Cristobal v. Jeffrey Siegel

Citations

  • 26 F.3d 1488
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4693
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 8709
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15462
  • 1994 WL 275586

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an unopposed motion for summary 25 judgment may be granted only after the court determines 26 there are no material issues of fact
  • holding that an unopposed motion for summary 20 judgment may be granted only after the court determines 21 there are no material issues of fact
  • explaining that a nonmoving party’s failure to respond to a motion for summary judgment, alone, does not provide authority to grant the motion; instead, the court must independently evaluate its sufficiency
  • explaining that a nonmoving party’s failure to respond to a motion for summary judgment, alone, does not provide authority to grant the motion; instead, the court must independently evaluate its sufficiency
  • where a nonmoving party fails to respond to a motion for summary judgment, this alone does not provide authority to grant the motion
  • unopposed motion may be granted only after court determines that there are no 18 material issues of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poole, Wiggins, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.