· 6/23/1994
Adrian L. Cristobal v. Jeffrey Siegel
Citations
- 26 F.3d 1488
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4693
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 8709
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15462
- 1994 WL 275586
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an unopposed motion for summary 25 judgment may be granted only after the court determines 26 there are no material issues of fact
- holding that an unopposed motion for summary 20 judgment may be granted only after the court determines 21 there are no material issues of fact
- explaining that a nonmoving party’s failure to respond to a motion for summary judgment, alone, does not provide authority to grant the motion; instead, the court must independently evaluate its sufficiency
- explaining that a nonmoving party’s failure to respond to a motion for summary judgment, alone, does not provide authority to grant the motion; instead, the court must independently evaluate its sufficiency
- where a nonmoving party fails to respond to a motion for summary judgment, this alone does not provide authority to grant the motion
- unopposed motion may be granted only after court determines that there are no 18 material issues of fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Poole, Wiggins, Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.