Adrian Kerciku and Najada Kerciku v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, and John Ashcroft, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an applicant’s due process rights were violated where the judge continually inter- rupted testimony and took over questioning
• finding violation of procedural due process where IJ first made up his mind about alien’s claims and refused to listen to testimony
• finding violation of procedural due process where IJ first made up his mind about alien’s claims and refused to listen to testimony
• an IJ “violates due process by barring complete chunks of oral testimony that would support the applicant’s claims”
• an IJ “violates due process by barring complete chunks of oral testimony that would support the applicant’s claims”
• an IJ “violates due process by barring complete chunks of oral testimony that would support the applicant’s claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).