Adrian G. Duplantier v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that rule of necessity applied where all federal judges would have an interest in a case challenging a statute that required federal judges to file annual personal financial statements.
• noting that although the Second Circuit held that Section 1391(e) is both a personal jurisdiction statute and a venue statute, other courts treat it as a venue statute only
• explaining that although the Second Circuit found that Section 1391(e) is both a personal jurisdiction statute and a venue statute, other courts have found that it is purely a venue statute
• discussing the erosion of public confidence in the government as exhibited by low voter turnout
• discussing the erosion of public confidence in the government as exhibited by low voter turnout
• noting specific characteristics of interest of judges who had already filed reports

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).