ADP Investor Communication Services, Inc. v. in House Attorney Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had adequately pleaded conversion when it sought to recover a specific sum sent by wire transfer to “In House’s bank account at California Bank & Trust c/o ILCS.”
• finding that allegations of a specific sum of money sent by wire transfer from the plaintiff’s identified bank account to the defendant were sufficient to state a claim for conversion
• finding that by stating the “exact amount of the wire transfer” the plaintiff “properly alleges an identifiable sum of money and therefore [its] conversion claim does not fail as a matter of law”
• finding complaint adequately pled conversion, in part, as it alleged an identifiable sum of money that was sent to defendant’s bank account
• refusing to dismiss claim of conversion under New York law where plaintiff sufficiently alleged conversion of money sent via wire transfer of a specific amount
• finding plausible conversion claim where plaintiff alleged the exact amount of a wire transfer of $277,699.89

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).