Adoption of: N.S. Jr. of: N.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that post-fraud mailings assuring victims that their money was received and that the promised services would be performed were in furtherance of the fraudulent scheme
• holding that activities in support of fraudulent activity, but not directly fraudulent in and of themselves, can also be considered violative of the federal mail fraud statute
• holding that activities in support of fraudulent activity, but not directly fraudulent in and of themselves, can also be considered violative of the federal mail fraud statute
• holding that mailing element was satisfied where the defendants sent letters to fraud victims in an attempt to convince them that the promised services would be performed even though mailings were sent after victims’ money had been obtained
• stating that allegations in indictment are treated as true when reviewing Rule 12(b) motions to dismiss
• finding defendants mailed lulling letters in furtherance of a “nationwide, fraudulent scheme” to fraudulently obtain fees from businesspeople

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).