Adoption of: J.C.S. Petition of: T.S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that vocational expert’s testimony satisfied Commissioner’s evidentia-ry burden where it was based on substantial record evidence
• holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to remand for further proceedings where Commissioner failed to meet her burden at step five
• stating that remand for calculation of benefits was “hardly out of the question” where the Commissioner erred at step five
• providing that if deadlines for further administrative proceedings at the fifth step, on which the Commissioner bears the burden of proof, are not met, “a calculation of benefits owed [plaintiff] must be made immediately
• providing that if deadlines for further administrative proceedings at the fifth step, on which the Commissioner bears the burden of proof, are not met, “a calculation of benefits owed [plaintiff] must be made immediately
• providing that if deadlines for further administrative proceedings at the fifth step, on which the Commissioner bears the burden of proof, are not met, “a calculation of benefits owed [plaintiff] must be made immediately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).