Admiral Insurance v. Abshire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the class comprises only individuals or successors of individuals who were parties to the suits filed in the early 1990s”
• holding, in reviewing for whether removal was objectively reasonable, that “[a]lthough it may have been ‘objectively unreasonable’ for” the removing party to conclude it had a basis to remove, “we cannot say that reaching the opposite conclusion was an abuse of discretion”
• affirming the district court’s conclusion that removal was objectively reasonable where the only Fifth Circuit case on point left unsettled questions regarding the propriety of removal
• \Section 1446 protects a plaintiffs choice of forum from a defendant’s untimely effort to remove unless the defendant could not have removed the case before or did not have the same incentives to remove it\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).