Administrator of the Estate of Michael D. Veilleux & a. v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that argument made only in “single, conclusory statement” on appeal forfeited
• explaining that the regulation specifically mentions campaigns, candidates, parties, lobbying of elected officials, and political issues
• holding in part that an as-applied First Amendment Free Speech challenge was “doubly forfeit” when not raised in the district court and when included in the appellate brief only as a “single, conclusory statement”
• if party’s argument consists of “single, conclusory statement,” argument is forfeited
• arguments not made are generally forfeited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).