Skip to main content
· 6/16/1994

Adlowitz v. City of New York

Citations

  • 205 A.D.2d 369
  • 613 N.Y.S.2d 174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the references to “elements” in Torres and Edwards do not resolve the divisibility of N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:35-10 because, inter alia, “those State decisions did not give the term ‘elements’ the precise meaning and significance the Supreme Court did in Mathis”
  • looking to a similarly-structured Pennsylvania drug statute in discerning the elements of a New Jersey drug statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.