· 6/17/1998
Adler v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.
Citations
- 13 F. Supp. 2d 912
- 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 775
- 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2647
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9276
- 1998 WL 327068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the prohibition against pre-employment inquiries specifically refers back to the general prohibition against qualified individuals with disabilities
- requiring plaintiffs to replead perceived disability claims by identifying each plaintiff’s specific impairment or injury
- requiring plaintiffs to replead perceived disability claims by identifying each plaintiff’s specific impairment or injury
- after examining the plain meaning of a statute, “‘if doubts remain, [the court] must resolve them in the light, not only of the policy intended to be served by the enactment, but, as well, by all other available aids to construction’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.