Skip to main content
· 6/17/1998

Adler v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.

Citations

  • 13 F. Supp. 2d 912
  • 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 775
  • 158 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2647
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9276
  • 1998 WL 327068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prohibition against pre-employment inquiries specifically refers back to the general prohibition against qualified individuals with disabilities
  • requiring plaintiffs to replead perceived disability claims by identifying each plaintiff’s specific impairment or injury
  • requiring plaintiffs to replead perceived disability claims by identifying each plaintiff’s specific impairment or injury
  • after examining the plain meaning of a statute, “‘if doubts remain, [the court] must resolve them in the light, not only of the policy intended to be served by the enactment, but, as well, by all other available aids to construction’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.