Adler v. Copeland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that that the attractive nuisance doctrine “is an exception to the rule of nonliability to infant trespassers”
• court found the attractive nuisance doctrine inapplicable as there was no trap and the deceased infant was not a trespasser

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).