Adkins v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying plaintiffs' motion to remand based on fraudulent joinder of law firm hired to foreclose
• “Section 1927 does not distinguish between winners and losers and is concerned only with limiting the abuse of court processes.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• rejecting argument that there are concurrent proceedings barring removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).