Adkins v. Meador

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute's more inclusive requirement that insured be \using\ vehicle superseded policy's requirement that insured be \occupying\ vehicle
• remanding to determine if construction worker’s injuries were causally related to his use of the vehicle
• policy requirement that highway construction worker occupy vehicle in order to be insured was void
• “When the language of an insurance policy is contrary to statute and therefore void, the policy should be construed to contain the coverage required by West Virginia law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).