Arizona Supreme Court· 1/30/1964
Adkins v. Industrial Commission
Citations
- 389 P.2d 118
- 95 Ariz. 239
- 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Article 18, Section 8 and House Bill No. 227 must be construed together
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Struckmeyer, Udall, Lockwood, Bernstein, Jennings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-31· cited 60×
- Maness v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1967-12-13· cited 51×
- Davila v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1965-06-30· cited 22×
- Carabetta v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-05-21· cited 21×
- Gallegos v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-03· cited 20×
- Mannel v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-05-17· cited 18×
- Powell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1967-02-09· cited 18×
- Ream v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-01-25· cited 16×
- Roach v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-26· cited 16×
- Gutierrez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-07-08· cited 15×
- Sims v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-11-12· cited 14×
- Dabbs v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-02-18· cited 14×
- Meva Corporation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-06-10· cited 14×
- Bierman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-02-10· cited 13×
- Shroyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1965-12-09· cited 13×
- Mickelson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-02-26· cited 12×
- Moore v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-10-27· cited 11×
- International Metal Products Division of McGraw-Edison Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-20· cited 10×
- Davis v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-03-14· cited 10×
- Herman v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1966-05-12· cited 10×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1960-02-24· cited 92×
- Alabam's Freight Co. v. HuntArizona Supreme Court· 1926-01-07· cited 81×
- Hoffman v. BrophyArizona Supreme Court· 1944-05-22· cited 62×
- Red Rover Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1941-11-10· cited 60×
- Steward v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1949-07-18· cited 59×
- Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court· 1963-05-29· cited 53×
- Paulley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1962-05-31· cited 40×
- Phelps Dodge Corp., Morenci Br. v. Industrial Com'nArizona Supreme Court· 1962-01-31· cited 25×
- Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyArizona Supreme Court· 1961-07-17· cited 24×
- London v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1950-11-14· cited 23×
- Industrial Commission v. CrismanArizona Supreme Court· 1921-07-18· cited 21×
- Gullick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-27· cited 18×
- Engle v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1954-04-26· cited 15×
- Williams v. Williams Insulation Materials, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1962-03-14· cited 14×
- Rahar v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-19· cited 12×
- Lee v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1950-12-08· cited 11×
- Gallo v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1958-03-05· cited 11×
- McAllister v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1960-05-18· cited 9×
- Vance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1963-06-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.