Adkins v. Hontz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a question asking if the person has an amount in mind, in the abstract, above which they would not award no matter what the evidence revealed was proper and not objectionable
• “The exclusion of cumulative evidence is not considered prejudicial on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).