Adkins v. Harrington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a question of fact exists as to whether plaintiff should have seen a puddle — a non-static hazard — prior to a fall
• holding that a question of fact exists as to whether plaintiff should have seen a puddle — a non- static hazard — prior to a fall
• “In this case, the evidence does not support a finding on summary judgment that the puddle was or should have been readily discernible to [plaintiff] prior to his fall.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).