Skip to main content
· 8/4/2000

Adkins v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad

Citations

  • 615 N.W.2d 469
  • 260 Neb. 156
  • 2000 Neb. LEXIS 187
  • 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Neb. Rev.Stat. § 48-1118(2) 2 contains the statute of limitations applicable to NFEPA claims brought pursuant to section 20-148
  • declining to apply the catch-all statute of limitations continued on next page... SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 8 (0
  • declining to apply the catch-all statute of limitations continued on next page... SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 8 (0
  • for NFEPA claims brought pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 20-148 (and thus not submitted to the NEOC), Neb. Rev.Stat. § 48-1118(2
  • for NFEPA claims brought pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 20-148 (and thus not submitted to the NEOC), Neb. Rev.Stat. § 48-1118(2) nevertheless provides the applicable statute of limitations, and that is “within 300 days after the occurrence of the alleged unlawful employment practice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, Stephan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.