District of Columbia· 3/31/2009

Adesalu v. Copps

Citations

606 F. Supp. 2d 97
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30291
2009 WL 824725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that, notwithstanding Brady, “the Court still first must determine whether plaintiff has suffered an adverse employment action”
noting that “[w]hile Brady directs the district court’s focus to the employer’s proffered non-discriminatory reason, the Court still first must determine whether plaintiff has suffered an adverse employment action”
declining, in Title VII case, to recognize plaintiff’s denial of defendant’s asserted material fact where he failed to comply with Rule 7’s requirement that denials must be supported by citation to record evidence
“if plaintiff ‘knew or should have known’ of the non-promotion decisions before ... 45 days prior to this initial contact, they are time-barred.” (citation omitted)
“Plaintiff could not have suffered an adverse employment action for failure to promote when there were no available vacancies.”
“if plaintiff ‘knew or should have known’ of the nonpromotion decisions before ... 45 days prior to this initial contact, they are time- barred.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul L. Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.