Adem A. Albra v. Advan, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ADA precludes individual liability for both discrimination and retaliation claims
• holding that plaintiff failed to properly effect service where plaintiff “served [defendant] by mailing a copy of the summons without attaching a copy of the complaint” and explaining that “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c
• holding that the ADEA, like Title VII, does not “countenance individual liability”
• holding that pro se litigants are required to conform to procedural rules
• holding that the ADA precludes individual liability for discrimination and retaliation
• explaining that pleadings filed by a pro se litigant are construed liberally, but pro se litigants must nevertheless con- form to procedural rules, including deadlines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).