Additive Controls & Measurement Systems, Inc. v. Flowdata, Inc. And Titan Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Section 1338 jurisdiction existed over state law business disparagement claim that required proof of patent non-infringement
• holding Section 1338 jurisdiction existed over state law business disparagement claim that required proof of patent non-infringement
• holding Section 1338 jurisdiction existed over state law business disparagement claim that required proof of patent non-infringement
• discussing. application of federal patent law to a business disparagement claim
• “[T]he only acts the injunction may prohibit are infringement of the patent by the adjudicated devices and infringement by devices not more than colorably different from the adjudicated devices. In order to comply with Rule 65(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).